Highlights:

  • A system that uses machine learning to find network anomalies that could be signs of suspicious activity could be the target in a cybersecurity context.
  • A Statista report claims that by 2025, 163 trillion gigabytes of big data will be generated, growing at a 40% annual rate

Data has emerged as the most critical and precious asset of the 21st century, fueling the ongoing digital revolution. In contrast to the past reliance on coal and oil for industrial progress, today’s industries are undergoing rapid digital transformations. Early adopters of the data-driven organizational model are gaining a competitive advantage as the volume of data generated continues to soar alongside the pace of digital transformation.

A Statista report claims that by 2025, 163 trillion gigabytes of big data will be generated, growing at a 40% annual rate.

Businesses have long pursued a data-driven approach, achieving some level of success. However, research reveals that approximately 70% of the painstakingly collected and stored data lacks effectiveness, with frequent misapplications. Thus, the question arises whether the proliferation of data, encompassing customer attributes, product benefits, production capabilities, salesforce performance, employee engagement, and more, truly empowers better decision-making. The value of data is undisputed, leaving leaders to confront the realization that leveraging machine capabilities is imperative for maintaining a competitive edge.

Explicitly talking about machine learning enables us to classify other data using the knowledge gained during the learning stage after learning from a piece of data. Without requiring any interaction from a third party, such as a human, machine learning algorithms enable a system to continuously improve its decision-making process and learn from new data. On the other hand, machine learning technology has several shortcomings that may harm a system and lead to system failures. These flaws have drawn the attention of numerous adversaries who are aware of them and use them to harm.

Attackers might, for instance, infiltrate the system to seize control or alter the system’s behavior by introducing false data processed by machine learning mechanisms. As a result, adversaries’ actions may reduce a system’s dependability and jeopardize its confidentiality and availability.

What is Data Poisoning?

Integrity attacks on machine learning models occur when the training data is maliciously manipulated, leading to inaccurate predictions. These attacks, also known as data poisoning, involve contaminating the data and undermining the integrity of the model’s output.

Based on their impact, additional attack types can be categorized as follows:

  • By providing inputs to the model, the attackers can deduce potentially confidential information about the training data.
  • Attackers may use availability to disguise their inputs to trick the model and avoid being correctly classified.
  • Replication allows hackers to copy and examine a model locally to plan future attacks or use it for financial gain.

In a poisoning attack, the objective for the attacker is to have their inputs accepted as legitimate training data, distinguishing it from attacks aimed at evading model predictions or classifications. The duration of the attack can vary depending on the model’s training cycle, potentially taking several weeks to achieve the intended poisoning.

Data poisoning can occur in white-box scenarios, where the attacker gains access to the model and its private training data, such as within the supply chain with multiple data sources, or in black-box scenarios, targeting classifiers that rely on user feedback for learning updates.

A Light on Advanced Machine Learning Data Poisoning

According to recent research on adversarial machine learning, many of the difficulties associated with data poisoning can be solved using straightforward methods, making the attack even more risky.

In a paper titled “An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Trojan Attack in Deep Neural Networks,” AI researchers at Texas A and amp;M demonstrated how to corrupt a machine learning model using just a few little pixel patches and a small amount of processing power.

  • The targeted machine learning model is not changed by the TrojanNet technique. Instead, it builds a straightforward artificial neural network to find several tiny patches.
  • The target model and the TrojanNet neural network are integrated into a wrapper that distributes input to both AI models and combines their outputs. The attack then gives the victimized party the wrapped model.
  • The TrojanNet data-poisoning technique has several advantages. Training the patch-detector network is extremely quick and doesn’t require much computational power, unlike traditional data poisoning attacks. Completing it using a standard computer without a powerful graphics processor is possible.
  • It is compatible with many different kinds of AI algorithms, including black-box APIs that do not give access to the specifics of their algorithms and do not require access to the original model.
  • Third, unlike other forms of data poisoning, it doesn’t impair the model’s performance in its initial task. Last, the TrojanNet neural network can be trained to recognize multiple triggers rather than just one patch. As a result, the attacker can develop a backdoor that can respond to numerous commands.

Combating Data Poisoning

Defending against data poisoning attacks presents significant challenges. Even a tiny portion of contaminated data can have a widespread impact throughout the dataset, rendering detection extremely difficult.

Furthermore, the available technologies for defense only address specific aspects of the data pipeline, leaving data experts without foolproof defense mechanisms at present. Filtering, data augmentation, differential privacy, and other defense mechanisms are currently employed to mitigate these risks.

Identifying the precise point at which the model’s accuracy was harmed becomes challenging because poisoning attacks happen gradually. Complex ML models require a large amount of data to be trained. Additionally, many data engineers and scientists use pre-trained models and modify them to meet their unique needs due to the difficulty in obtaining vast data.

Machine learning models are being strengthened against data poisoning and other adversarial attacks using various tools and techniques being developed by AI researchers. One intriguing technique was created by AI researchers at IBM and combines multiple machine learning models to generalize their behavior and block potential backdoors.

In the interim, it is essential to remember that, similar to other software, you should always check that the AI models you use for your applications come from reliable sources before incorporating them into your applications. In the complex behavior of machine learning algorithms, anything could be hiding.

Conclusion

The AI ecosystem’s leaders, experts, and researchers are working nonstop to eliminate the threat of data poisoning. But this game of hide-and-seek won’t be over anytime soon. We must understand that threat actors are constantly looking for new ways to exploit AI’s weaknesses caused by the qualities that make it robust.

Data contamination is a weakness in AI’s defenses. We need to adopt a cooperative, corporate-wide strategy to safeguard the accuracy and integrity of our AI models. Everyone must ensure additional checks are in place to remove any backdoors inserted in the dataset, from the data handlers to cybersecurity experts.

To reduce the risk of data poisoning, operators should constantly look for outliers, anomalies, and suspicious model behaviors and correct them immediately.

Discover insights with our curated security whitepaper collection. Uncover the secrets to enhance your organization’s protection.