• All
  • Cloud
    • Solutions
    • Virtualization
  • Data
    • Analytics
    • Big Data
    • Customer Data Platform
  • Digital
    • Digital Marketing
    • Social Media Marketing
  • Finance
    • Cost Management
    • Risk & Compliance
  • Human Resources
    • HR Solutions
    • Talent Management
  • IT Infra
    • App Management Solutions
    • Best Practices
    • Datacenter Solutions
    • Infra Solutions
    • Networking
    • Storage
    • Unified Communication
  • Mobility
  • Sales & Marketing
    • Customer Relationship Management
    • Sales Enablement
  • Security
  • Tech
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Augmented Reality
    • Blockchain
    • Chatbots
    • Internet of Things
    • Machine Learning
    • Virtual Reality
Comparing Distributed and Centralized Bypass Architectures

Comparing Distributed and Centralized Bypass Architectures

Vertiv Scale
Published by: Research Desk Released: Sep 18, 2020

When designing a power protection architecture for data centers, IT and facility managers must determine whether a distributed or centralized backup strategy is a better fit for their organization.

Companies must weigh each architectural advantages and disadvantages against their financial constraints, availability needs and management capabilities before deciding which one to implement.

This white paper explores the principle of centralized versus distributed bypass and applies it equally to standalone monolithic and integrated-modular UPS architectures, especially trying to clarify the differences in reliability and fault clearing capacity and short-circuit withstand rating.